The main advantages of this method are: first| comparison between two languages helps students to have a better understanding of the meaning of abstract words and complicated sentences. Second| systematic study of grammatical rules plays an important role in fostering students' ability of reading comprehension and producing grammatically correct sentences. Understanding and manipulating the morphology and syntax will develop students' ability of analyzing and solving problems. Third| the focus on understanding literary texts provides the situation in which reading and writing abilities are well trained. Fourth| it makes few demands on teachers although it often creates frustration for students. It is relatively easy to apply.
Disadvantages in this method are: First| overemphasis on translation can never emancipate the learners from dependence on the first language. Second| knowing a large number of grammatical rules cannot ensure that students can use them appropriately in real communicative situation. Third| it puts too much emphasis on reading and writing and neglects listening and speaking. Fourth| the texts are mostly taken from literary works. The language learned often doesn't meet the practical needs of the learners. Fifth| memorizing grammar rules and bilingual word lists does not motivate students to actively communicate in the target language.