Practice 1　　In order to work here the foreigner needs a work permit, which must be applied for by his  1 employer. The problem here is that the Department of the Employment has the right to  2   or refuse these permits, and there is little that can be done about it. It would be extremely unwise for a foreign visitor to work without a permit, since anyone doing so is  3   to immediate deportation. There are some  4 to this rule, most notably people from the Common Market countries, who are  5 to work without permits, and who are often given temporary residence permits of up to five years. Some other people, such as doctors, foreign journalists, authors and others, can work without permits.　　The problem with the act is not just that some of its rules are unfair but the way it is  6 , and the people who administer it.　　An immigration official has the power to stop a visitor off these shores coming into the country. If this happens the visitor has the right to appeal  7   the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. While the appeals are being  8 , the visitor has no choice but to wait sometimes for quite a long time.　　Critics of the law say that immigration officials treat the confused visitors badly, and appear to accept or reject them for no  9 reason. Which side of the political  10 you are on, there seems to be an urgent need for a good look at the Act, for it causes frequent argument, and in the eyes of many real injustice.[A] prospective　　　[B] for　　　　　[C] fence[D] to　　　　　　　 [E] liable　　　 [F] apparent[G] administered　　 [H] regulations　[I] exceptions[J] employed　　　　 [K] considered　 [L] grant[M] long-standing　　[N] entitled　　 [O] exemption